Purpose: Cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) can characterize carotid atherosclerosis. The purpose of this study is to evaluate reader agreement of carotid atherosclerotic lesion types by CMR.
Methods: Carotid arteries of 34 patients (29 men, 5 women; mean age, 53 years) were imaged on a 1.5-T scanner. Images with 4 contrast weightings (T1, T2, proton density, and 3-dimensional time-of-flight) were acquired on each axial slice of the carotid arteries. Modified AHA criteria were used for lesion type assessment on the 4 selected axial slices (1 from the common carotid artery, 1 from the carotid bifurcation, and 2 from the internal carotid artery). The modified AHA criteria are as follows: type I-II, near-normal wall thickness without calcification; type III, diffuse wall thickening or small eccentric plaque without calcification; type IV-V, plaque with a lipid rich necrotic core surrounded by fibrous tissue with possible calcification; type VI, complex plaque with a possible surface defect, hemorrhage, or thrombus; type VII, calcified plaque; and type VIII, fibrotic plaque without a lipid core and with possible small calcifications.
Results: Of the 272 possible axial slices (34 patients x 2 arteries per patient x 4 slices per artery), 256 slices were available for lesion type assessment. The majority (94%) of the lesions were of type I-II and III. kappa was 0.80 and 0.60 for intra-reader and inter-reader agreement of lesion types, respectively. Inter-reader disagreement for type I-II and type III occurred in 82% of lesions. Weighted kappa was 0.92 and 0.83 for intra-reader and inter-reader agreement of lesion types, respectively.
Conclusion: The difference between type I-II and III lesions lies in the definition of the vessel wall. The moderate inter-reader agreement suggests further efforts such as establishment of normal carotid artery wall thickness by a quantitative measure are needed for carotid atherosclerotic lesion characterization.