Is 44-hour better than 24-hour ambulatory blood pressure monitoring in hemodialysis?

Kidney Blood Press Res. 2006;29(5):273-9. doi: 10.1159/000096176. Epub 2006 Oct 11.

Abstract

The aim of this study is to evaluate if hemodialysis (HD) patients with similar blood pressure (BP) in the whole inter-HD period could have different target organ lesions and survival if the behavior of BP differs from the first to the second day of the inter-HD period. The present study compares 44-hour ambulatory BP monitoring (ABPM) patterns in 45 HD patients. Three BP patterns emerged: group A (n = 15) had similar BPs throughout (138 +/- 11/88 +/- 12 in the first 22 h vs. 140 +/- 11/87 +/- 12 mm Hg in the second 22-hour period); group B (n = 15) had a significant systolic BP rise from the first to the second period (132 +/- 15/80 +/- 12 vs. 147 +/- 12/86 +/- 13 mm Hg, p < 0.05); group C (n = 15) had significantly higher BPs (p < 0.05) than the other 2 groups throughout the whole inter-HD period, with no significant change between the 2 halves (172 +/- 14/108 +/- 12 vs. 173 +/- 18/109 +/- 14 mm Hg). Ventricular mass and survival during the 30-month follow-up period were statistically significantly better in group A, intermediate in group B and worse in group C. The data suggest that a 44-hour ABPM is more accurate than a 24-hour one in evaluating organ lesion and prognosis in HD patients.

Publication types

  • Comparative Study

MeSH terms

  • Adult
  • Aged
  • Algorithms
  • Antihypertensive Agents / therapeutic use
  • Blood Pressure Monitoring, Ambulatory / methods*
  • Echo-Planar Imaging
  • Electrocardiography
  • Female
  • Heart Rate / physiology
  • Humans
  • Hypertension / complications
  • Hypertension / diagnosis
  • Hypertension / physiopathology
  • Kidney Failure, Chronic / mortality
  • Kidney Failure, Chronic / physiopathology*
  • Kidney Failure, Chronic / therapy*
  • Kidney Function Tests
  • Male
  • Middle Aged
  • Renal Dialysis / methods*
  • Survival Analysis

Substances

  • Antihypertensive Agents