HIV testing in 2006: issues and methods

Expert Rev Anti Infect Ther. 2006 Aug;4(4):565-82. doi: 10.1586/14787210.4.4.565.

Abstract

Infection with HIV and subsequent development of AIDS is a pandemic. The Joint United Nations Program on HIV/AIDS together with the WHO and many relevant funding bodies demand that those infected should be reliably identified so that people who need, or will need, therapy may be provided for over time. This means that there is a renewed interest in testing for HIV and in laboratories' performances and quality. Whatever the conditions under which testing is performed, and whatever the levels of training, the tests and their outcomes must exhibit equivalent, high standards of performance and reliable results. This is regardless of whether testing is conducted in the most sophisticated laboratories (either diagnostic or transfusion screening) to voluntary testing and counseling centers where those conducting testing may not be technically trained. This is not currently the case, especially in some places where HIV is most prevalent. To achieve uniformly high performance standards, quality assurance programs are imperative, but currently not sufficiently valued to be well supported with adequate funding or human resources. Accurate HIV testing is a cornerstone of blood safety, diagnosis of infection, patient management and surveillance.

Publication types

  • Review

MeSH terms

  • Animals
  • HIV Infections / diagnosis
  • HIV Infections / epidemiology*
  • HIV Seropositivity / diagnosis
  • HIV Seropositivity / epidemiology
  • HIV-1*
  • Humans
  • Immunoassay / methods
  • Immunoassay / trends
  • Mass Screening / methods*
  • Mass Screening / trends
  • Polymerase Chain Reaction / methods
  • Polymerase Chain Reaction / trends
  • World Health Organization