The second part of the issue, dedicated to the nursing management offers a discussion on some of the relevant areas of debate for the organization of nursing care. A reflection on the core contents and main aims of basic and post basic (master, advanced level, specialistic degree) nursing courses is proposed in the first contribution. Then a selection of topics is presented, focusing on the main research contributions available in the literature and on the ongoing debate for the following areas: the role of communication at the inter-shift handover and the new model of bedside reporting; the problems and challenges of doctors nurses collaboration in the health care team; the problems and expectations of new nurses joining the health care team and the process of development of practical skills; the hot debate on nursing roles and level of practice and the difficulties in differentiating between elementary, specialist and advanced nursing practice; the new emerging roles: the characteristics and achievements of Nurse Consultant; the new challenges of coordinators of the health care teams with the management of the multigenerational nursing team. For each topic a definition of the problem is presented, an example of relevant study, a critical debate and suggestions for further studies and areas of research. A list of the main journals that deal with nursing management is proposed with comments on the main characteristics of each journal. A study protocol that aims at describing the outcomes of the different styles and models of organization of medical wards on patients and nurses is presented as an example of organizative research; an experience of, and a model for, participation of the nurses to health policy planning is proposed. Nurses were, asked to identify health care problems encountered in their daily practice, their causes and propose solutions at basic and policy level. The session of International Observatory explores the main problems and difficulties of the research on the organization of care, focusing more on opportunities than on the challenges and drawbacks of the available literature.