We have analyzed data collected over a 26-year period for influences of new diagnostic imaging techniques (ultrasound, computed tomography, and magnetic resonance imaging) on the size, stage, and other parameters of renal cell carcinomas at the time of first diagnosis. We reviewed retrospectively the records of 203 patients who underwent operations at our institutions from 1973 to 1999. All the patients suffered from renal cell carcinoma. With this study we attempted to answer four questions regarding changes over this time span: (1) have new imaging techniques lead to a reduction in the median diameter of the tumor upon first diagnosis, (2) has the tumor stage decreased due to earlier diagnosis, (3) is there any correlation between tumor size and tumor stage, and (4) are the patient's early diagnoses at a younger age? Other parameters such as infiltration of the renal pelvis and the cell type were also examined. The tumor size and stage at the time of diagnosis and treatment are positively correlated, and both decrease significantly over the time span examined. There is also a strong association between tumor size and infiltration of the renal pelvis. The median age of the patients did not significantly change over time. The wider use of improved imaging techniques has significantly changed the clinical appearance of the renal cell carcinoma. The question is whether these techniques have also affected the prognosis of the disease.