Evaluation of bond strength of metal brackets by a resin to ceramic surfaces

J Clin Dent. 2006;17(1):5-9.

Abstract

Objective: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the bond strength of three different ceramic brands with two different ceramic surfaces (glazed and deglazed), with and without silane application.

Methodology: Using the three different ceramics (Empress 2, Finesse, and Ceramco II), two metallic brackets were bonded to each sample, one with the adhesive system and the other one with a silane application. The samples were thermocycled, and then the debonding tests were performed with the Instron Universal Testing Machine. All the results were statistically analyzed with a three-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) test.

Results: The three-way ANOVA (brand, ceramic surface, with/without silane) indicated significant differences among them (p < 0.05). ANOVA showed that the greatest bond strength value (megapascals, MPa) was for Empress 2 deglazed with the silane application (8.873 MPa), followed by Finesse glazed with the silane application (7.072 MPa).

Conclusion: The ceramic surface has a direct effect on adhesion. Therefore, Empress 2 deglazed achieved the greatest value in bond strength. To achieve the ideal values of 6-10 MPa, applying silane to the ceramic surface before bonding the brackets is recommended, even though silane can damage the ceramic surface.

Publication types

  • Comparative Study

MeSH terms

  • Dental Bonding*
  • Dental Porcelain*
  • Dental Stress Analysis
  • Lithium Compounds
  • Materials Testing
  • Metals
  • Microscopy, Electron, Scanning
  • Orthodontic Brackets*
  • Resin Cements*
  • Shear Strength
  • Silanes
  • Surface Properties

Substances

  • Empress 2
  • Lithium Compounds
  • Metals
  • Resin Cements
  • Silanes
  • Transbond XT
  • Dental Porcelain
  • finesse
  • Ceramco