Availability of a virtual learning environment does not compensate for the lack of a physical facility

Med Teach. 2006 May;28(3):258-63. doi: 10.1080/01421590600605132.

Abstract

A virtual learning environment (VLE), including access to on-line journals, was set up in support of a new medical curriculum delivered at two campuses. We evaluated student perceptions and use of the VLE including the library facilities using several qualitative and quantitative data methods and the results were triangulated. Paper copies of set texts are provided at each site; however, one site also has a traditional library for the training of professions allied to medicine. As the teaching was identical at each site, this gave us the opportunity for a study exploring the effect of having a physical library facility on the use of the VLE. Although ten-fold more loans were made from the library with the medical sources than from the other site, use of the VLE was very similar at both sites, suggesting that reduced access to hard copy books and journals was not compensated for by increased use of electronic library resources. As expected, training, ease of navigation and access to the VLE were very important to student satisfaction.

Publication types

  • Comparative Study
  • Evaluation Study

MeSH terms

  • Computer-Assisted Instruction / methods*
  • Curriculum
  • Education, Medical, Undergraduate / organization & administration*
  • Focus Groups
  • Humans
  • Libraries, Digital / statistics & numerical data*
  • Libraries, Medical / statistics & numerical data*
  • Population Surveillance
  • United Kingdom