Purpose: The two methods recommended for estimation of differential renal function (DRF) in the renography guidelines published by the European Association of Nuclear Medicine are the area under the background-subtracted time-activity curves (AUCs) (often called the integral method) and the regression slope of the background-subtracted Rutland/Patlak plot analysis. The current study investigated the agreement/disagreement of DRF estimations obtained using these two techniques. This report also focusses on the occurrence of supranormal function of the affected kidney (defined as DRF >55%) and reviews the related technical and physiological factors.
Methods: A total of 394 renographic studies in 101 children with a prenatal diagnosis of unilateral renal pelvic dilatation confirmed on postnatal studies were retrieved from optical disc and reprocessed by one author. DRF was calculated using the Rutland/Patlak plot and the AUC over the time period 40-120 s following an injection of( 99m)Tc-mercaptoacetyltriglycine. The difference in DRF between the methods (Rutland/Patlak minus AUC) and 95% limits of agreement were calculated. The age distribution of the difference between the methods was also analysed.
Results: For all 394 measurements the mean difference was -0.8% (range -21.0% to 16.9%, SD 3.9%). The 95% limits of agreement were -7.0% to 8.6%. Analysis of the data revealed that greater spread of DRF between the techniques was seen in studies performed at a younger age: a discrepancy of >5% DRF was significantly more common in those <1 year of age than in those >1 year old (25.3% vs 9.9%; chi-square, p<0.0005). Supranormal function was found less frequently using the Rutland/Patlak method than with the AUC method (8.4% vs 11.2%; chi-square, p<0.0005). The frequency of this diagnosis was reduced to 4.6% when both methods were required to be in agreement.
Conclusion: The current study supports the existence of age-related variation in the disparity of DRF estimations using the AUC and Rutland/Patlak methods in children with unilateral pelvic dilatation. The close agreement between the AUC and Rutland/Patlak techniques in estimation of DRF in older children supports their use. However, careful quality control of the renogram analysis is essential in young babies. Supranormal renal function (>55% DRF) may in fact be much less common in this group of children than is currently reported.