3.0 T versus 1.5 T pediatric brain imaging

Neuroimaging Clin N Am. 2006 May;16(2):229-39, ix. doi: 10.1016/j.nic.2006.02.009.

Abstract

This article represents a review of the authors' experience with two 3.0 T Siemens Trio Whole Body MR imaging units, with a cumulative experience of 12 months total imaging time on these scanners, over 1000 cases. The authors were able to identify and review numerous patients who had diagnostic studies both on 1.5 T and 3.0 T.

Publication types

  • Comparative Study
  • Review

MeSH terms

  • Adolescent
  • Artifacts
  • Brain / pathology*
  • Child
  • Child, Preschool
  • Feasibility Studies
  • Female
  • Humans
  • Imaging, Three-Dimensional
  • Magnetic Resonance Angiography / methods*
  • Magnetic Resonance Imaging / methods*
  • Magnetics
  • Male