Introduction: A 10-year experience with breast reconstruction in a university hospital was recently reviewed. The purpose of this study was to determine the subtypes of breast reconstructive procedures and to evaluate the frequency and change in technique over time of free TRAM (transverse rectus abdominis muscle) flap breast reconstruction performed at one institution. Trends in the development of the procedure over this period were also reviewed.
Materials & methods: Between November 1994 and September 2004, a 10-year retrospective chart review was conducted. The indications for mastectomy and reconstruction were determined. The median age was 48 (range 31-66). The range of follow-up was 2 to 71 months, with a median of 19.5 months. The mean follow-up was 23.5 months. Outcome data were grouped into 2 consecutive 5-year periods (period 1: 1994-1998; period 2: 1999-2004) and evaluated for changes over time in techniques and outcome. Statistical analysis (Decision Analyst, Inc., STATS Statistics software, version 1.1, 1998) was performed using the difference between 2 proportions module to assess the probability of a significant difference in the data for period 1 and period 2 parameters.
Results: Over a 10-year period, 117 patients underwent breast reconstruction. This consisted of 12 pedicle procedures (11.3%), including 1 bipedicle flap (0.9%) and 2 bilateral pedicle procedures (1.8%). There were 3 latissimus dorsi pedicle flaps (2.8%). Sixteen patients (15.1%) received tissue expander or implant reconstructions. Of the 117 patients, 79 underwent free flap breast reconstruction. Of the 79 free-flap patients, 22 (27.8%) had bilateral procedures, for a total of 101 free flaps performed in these 79 patients. Fifty-two patients underwent immediate reconstruction (65.8%) and 25 were delayed (31.6%) reconstructions using either deep inferior epigastric artery perforator (DIEP) flaps (4 = 3.9%) or free TRAM flaps (97 = 96.0%). A muscle-sparing technique was used in 43 of the 97 free TRAM flaps (44.3%). The preferred vascular inflow was the internal mammary artery, which was used in 66 out of 101 flaps (65.3%). The rate of anastomotic revision (arterial and venous) was 4.9%. The majority of cases used a 2.5-mm venous coupler (65.3%). In 2 of the free TRAM cases, there was insufficient volume to establish the patients preexisting volume. Therefore, at the patient's request, immediate implants were used to augment the reconstruction. The average hospital stay was 8.13 days, and the average intensive care stay was 4.59 days. When assessed for trends over time, we noted a reduction in our hospital length of stay and our ICU length of stay.
Conclusion: The experience with free tissue breast reconstruction reveals predominant use of the TRAM flap. This is justified by the reliability of this flap and the advances in achieving esthetic breast reconstruction. Additionally, we have begun performing DIEP free-flap reconstructions. Our clinical practice has evolved concurrent with standards of care, as noted by the increase in use of muscle-sparing techniques and the reduction in the use of dextran. We do not routinely use therapeutic anticoagulation in our cases. Our hospital length of stay and average intensive care length of stay have also decreased over time, consistent with a system-wide effort to increase the efficiency of healthcare delivery.