In the field of screening in general and especially in the kinase area, taking into consideration throughput and cost, fluorescence- and luminescence-based assays have been developed as alternatives to radioactivity-based assays. However, fluorescence-based technologies are not devoid of pitfalls. One of the main problems is interference from autofluorescent compounds and the incidence of false-positives as exemplified here with a fluorescence polarization (FP)-based assay. Using the scintillation proximity assay as the in-house standard, we assessed several alternatives to radioactive methods, namely, the amplified luminescent proximity homogeneous assay screen (ALPHAScreen, Perkin-Elmer Life Sciences, Boston, MA), enzyme fragment complementation, FP, and nanofluidics-based fluorescence intensity. Data comparing the sensitivity, robustness, relative sensitivity to autofluorescent compounds, enzyme consumption, and relative costs of each assay for one common kinase are presented. Results obtained seem to favor the nanofluidics mobility shift assay as a method of choice, followed by the direct FP approach, using generic high-molecular-weight phosphate group-binders.