Prevention of ventricular desynchronization by permanent para-Hisian pacing after atrioventricular node ablation in chronic atrial fibrillation: a crossover, blinded, randomized study versus apical right ventricular pacing

J Am Coll Cardiol. 2006 May 16;47(10):1938-45. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2006.01.056. Epub 2006 Apr 24.

Abstract

Objectives: The aim of our study was to evaluate the feasibility, the safety, and hemodynamic improvements induced by permanent para-Hisian pacing in patients with chronic atrial fibrillation and narrow QRS who underwent atrioventricular (AV) node ablation.

Background: Right ventricular apical pacing, inducing asynchronous ventricular contraction, may impair cardiac function; permanent para-Hisian pacing could preserve interventricular synchrony and improve left ventricular function.

Methods: After AV node ablation, 16 patients were implanted with a dual-chamber pacemaker connected to a screw-in lead positioned in close proximity to the His bundle and to a right ventricular apical lead. Clinical and echocardiographic data were collected at baseline and after two randomized six-month periods (with para-Hisian and conventional pacing).

Results: During para-Hisian pacing, the interventricular electromechanical delay improved as well (34 +/- 18 ms) as during right apical pacing (47 +/- 19 ms), p < 0.05. Para-Hisian pacing allowed an improvement in New York Heart Association functional class (1.75 +/- 0.4 vs. 2.33 +/- 0.6 at baseline and 2.5 +/- 0.4 during apical pacing, p < 0.05 for both), in quality-of-life score (16.2 +/- 8.7 vs. 32.5 +/- 15.0 at baseline, p < 0.05), and in the 6-min walk test (431 +/- 73 m vs. 378 +/- 60 m at baseline and 360 +/- 71 m during apical pacing, p < 0.5 for both). Mitral and tricuspid regurgitation improved during para-Hisian pacing (1.22 +/- 0.8 and 1.46 +/- 0.5 index, respectively, vs. 1.68 +/- 0.6 [p < 0.05] and 1.62 +/- 0.7 [p = NS] index at baseline, respectively), with a slight worsening during apical pacing (1.93 +/- 1 and 1.93 +/- 0.7 index, respectively, p < 0.05 for both).

Conclusions: Permanent para-Hisian pacing is feasible and safe. Compared with conventional right apical pacing, it allows an improvement in functional and hemodynamic parameters over long-term follow-up.

Publication types

  • Comparative Study
  • Randomized Controlled Trial

MeSH terms

  • Aged
  • Aged, 80 and over
  • Arrhythmias, Cardiac / etiology
  • Arrhythmias, Cardiac / physiopathology
  • Arrhythmias, Cardiac / prevention & control
  • Atrial Fibrillation / complications
  • Atrial Fibrillation / physiopathology
  • Atrial Fibrillation / therapy*
  • Atrioventricular Node
  • Bundle of His
  • Cardiac Pacing, Artificial / adverse effects
  • Cardiac Pacing, Artificial / methods*
  • Catheter Ablation* / adverse effects
  • Chronic Disease
  • Cross-Over Studies
  • Electrocardiography
  • Exercise Tolerance
  • Feasibility Studies
  • Female
  • Follow-Up Studies
  • Hemodynamics
  • Humans
  • Male
  • Middle Aged
  • Mitral Valve Insufficiency / etiology
  • Quality of Life
  • Single-Blind Method
  • Treatment Outcome
  • Tricuspid Valve Insufficiency / etiology
  • Ventricular Dysfunction, Left / complications