Prophylactic hemodialysis does not prevent contrast-induced nephropathy after cardiac catheterization in patients with chronic renal insufficiency

Circ J. 2006 May;70(5):553-8. doi: 10.1253/circj.70.553.

Abstract

Background: In Japan, prophylactic hemodialysis has been considered useful for preventing contrast-induced nephropathy (CIN).

Method and results: To assess whether hemodialysis prevented CIN, 391 patients (age: 69 +/- 8 years, 63 females) with chronic renal insufficiency (CRI, serum creatinine level (Scr) > or = 1.3 mg/dl) who underwent cardiac catheterization, were retrospectively analyzed. Patients were divided into 3 categories based on Scr: L (1.3 > or = Scr < 2.0 mg/dl, n = 332); M (2.0 > or = Scr < 3.0 mg/dl, n = 49); and H (Scr > or = 3.0 mg/dl, n = 10). To prevent CIN, 35 category M patients and all category L patients received hydration alone, whereas 14 category M patients and all category H patients received hemodialysis. CIN developed in 48 patients. The incidence of CIN in category H was significantly higher than that in category L or M (H, 40% vs L, 11% or M, 16% (p < 0.05)). In category M patients treated with hemodialysis, Scr increased from 2.4 +/- 0.3 to 3.0 +/- 0.5 mg/dl (p < 0.05) within 7 days, and 29% of patients developed CIN. However, in category M patients who did not receive hemodialysis, the Scr did not change (pre, 2.3 +/- 0.2 mg/dl to post, 2.2 +/- 0.4 mg/dl), and the incidence of CIN was 11%.

Conclusion: Prophylactic hemodialysis for CRI patients undergoing cardiac catheterization does not prevent CIN.

MeSH terms

  • Aged
  • Cardiac Catheterization*
  • Contrast Media / adverse effects*
  • Creatinine / blood
  • Female
  • Humans
  • Incidence
  • Kidney Diseases / chemically induced
  • Kidney Diseases / prevention & control*
  • Male
  • Middle Aged
  • Renal Dialysis*
  • Renal Insufficiency, Chronic / therapy*
  • Retrospective Studies

Substances

  • Contrast Media
  • Creatinine