64-slice computed tomography assessment of coronary artery stents: a phantom study

Acta Radiol. 2006 Feb;47(1):36-42. doi: 10.1080/02841850500406779.

Abstract

Purpose: To compare the use of a new 64-slice computed tomography (CT) scanner with 16-slice CT in the visualization of coronary artery stent lumen.

Material and methods: Eight different coronary artery stents, each with a diameter of 3 mm, were placed in a static chest phantom. The phantom was positioned in the CT gantry at an angle of 0 degrees and 45 degrees towards the z-axis and examined with both a 64-slice and a 16-slice CT scanner. Effective slice thickness was 0.6 mm with 64-slice CT and 1 mm with 16-slice CT. A reconstruction increment of 0.3 mm was applied in both scanners. Image quality was assessed visually using a 5-point grading scale. Stent diameters were measured and compared using paired Wilcoxon tests.

Results: Artificial lumen reduction was significantly less with 64-slice than with 16-slice CT. Average visible stent lumen was 53.4% using 64-slice CT and 47.5% with 16-slice MSCT. Most severe artifacts were seen in stents with radiopaque markers. Using 64-slice CT, image noise increased by approximately 30% due to thinner slice thickness.

Conclusion: Improved spatial resolution of 64-slice CT resulted in superior assessment of coronary artery stent lumen compared to 16-slice CT. However, a relevant part of the stent lumen is still not assessable with multi-slice CT.

Publication types

  • Comparative Study

MeSH terms

  • Artifacts
  • Coronary Angiography / instrumentation*
  • Coronary Angiography / methods*
  • Coronary Stenosis / diagnosis
  • Graft Occlusion, Vascular / diagnosis
  • Observer Variation
  • Phantoms, Imaging*
  • Reproducibility of Results
  • Stents*
  • Tomography, X-Ray Computed / instrumentation*
  • Tomography, X-Ray Computed / methods*