[Major depressive disorders and psychiatric emergencies: a naturalistic study on crisis intervention relevance]

Can J Psychiatry. 2005 Nov;50(13):857-62. doi: 10.1177/070674370505001309.
[Article in French]

Abstract

Objective: This retrospective study aimed to evaluate the impact of introducing crisis intervention patterns in the emergency unit of a general hospital on the number of admissions and outpatient follow-ups for patients with major depressive disorder.

Method: The study included all patients with major depressive disorder (DSM-IV criteria) who visited the psychiatric emergency unit in a general hospital during two 8-month periods: before (425 patients) and after (436 patients) crisis interventions were introduced.

Results: After crisis interventions were introduced, the voluntary admission rate decreased significantly (from 17.9% to 12.4%), while the number of outpatient follow-ups increased (from 82.1% to 86.2%). Borderline personality disorder was associated with a significant reduction of the admission rate (27.8% against 38.2%), while the admission rate for patients with depressive disorder with psychotic features did not decline after crisis interventions. Crisis interventions were more effective on women.

Conclusions: These outcomes suggest the relevance of crisis intervention in psychiatric emergency settings to improve the management of patients with major depressive disorder. Crisis intervention fosters outpatient multimodal follow-up rather than admission in a psychiatric setting.

Publication types

  • English Abstract

MeSH terms

  • Adult
  • Crisis Intervention*
  • Depressive Disorder, Major* / epidemiology
  • Depressive Disorder, Major* / psychology
  • Depressive Disorder, Major* / rehabilitation
  • Emergency Services, Psychiatric / statistics & numerical data*
  • Female
  • Hospitalization
  • Humans
  • Male
  • Middle Aged