A comparison of air and hydrogen peroxide oxygenated microbial fuel cell reactors

Biotechnol Prog. 2006 Jan-Feb;22(1):241-6. doi: 10.1021/bp050225j.

Abstract

In this study, a two-compartment continuous flow microbial fuel cell (MFC) reactor was used to compare the efficiencies of cathode oxygenation by air and by hydrogen peroxide. The MFC reactor had neither a proton-selective membrane nor an electron transfer mediator. At startup, the cathodic compartment was continuously aerated and the anodic compartment was fed with a glucose solution. An increase of electrical power generation from 0.008 to 7.2 mW m(-2) of anode surface with a steady-state potential of 215-225 mV was observed within a period of 12 days. The performance of the air-oxygenated MFC reactor progressively declined over time because of biofilm proliferation in the cathodic compartment. Oxygenation of the cathodic compartment using 300 mL d(-1) of 0.3% hydrogen peroxide solution resulted in a power density of up to 22 mW m(-2) (68.2 mA m(-2)) of anode surface at a potential of 340-350 mV. The use of H2O2 for oxygenation was found to improve the long-term stability of the MFC reactor.

Publication types

  • Comparative Study

MeSH terms

  • Air*
  • Bioelectric Energy Sources*
  • Bioreactors / microbiology*
  • Electrodes
  • Hydrogen Peroxide / chemistry*
  • Hydrogen Peroxide / metabolism
  • Oxygen / chemistry
  • Oxygen / metabolism*

Substances

  • Hydrogen Peroxide
  • Oxygen