Comparison of gas chromatographic-mass spectrometric methods for screening of chlorotriazine pesticides in soil

J Chromatogr. 1992 Jun 19;603(1-2):175-84. doi: 10.1016/0021-9673(92)85359-2.

Abstract

The performance of a coupled technique resulting from the combination of gas chromatography with a selective mass spectrometric technique (tandem mass spectrometry) (GC-MS-MS) with collisionally activated dissociation (CAD) and multi-reaction monitoring (MRM) was compared with that of GC-low resolution MS (GC-LRMS) at a resolving power of 1000 and GC-high-resolution MS (GC-HRMS) at resolving powers of 5000 and 10,000 for the determination of atrazine, simazine, cyanazine, deethylatrazine and deisopropylatrazine in polluted soil samples. GC-MS-MS daughter ion spectra for the parent ions [M]+. and [M - CH3]+ were generated using collisionally activated dissociation and studied. Also, by optimizing the collision energy for maximum sensitivity a method for screening chlorotriazines by MRM was developed. Analyses of soil sample extracts showed that GC-MS-MS overcomes interferences from other chlorotriazines and interfering compounds that could not be removed by GC-HRMS or GC-LRMS at resolving powers of 10,000 and 1000, respectively. The limits of detection for GC-MS-MS and GC-HRMS at a signal-to-noise ratio of 10 ranged between 1 and 24 pg, with a mean relative standard deviation of 25-30%. Soil samples known to contain chlorotriazines and their degradation products were analysed by GC-MS-MS and the results obtained were compared with those given by GC-HRMS at resolving powers of 5000 and 10,000, with quantification differences of 25-30%.

Publication types

  • Comparative Study
  • Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

MeSH terms

  • Gas Chromatography-Mass Spectrometry / methods*
  • Gas Chromatography-Mass Spectrometry / standards
  • Herbicides / analysis*
  • Sensitivity and Specificity
  • Soil Pollutants / analysis*
  • Triazines*

Substances

  • Herbicides
  • Soil Pollutants
  • Triazines