On the origins of the task mixing cost in the cuing task-switching paradigm

J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2005 Nov;31(6):1477-91. doi: 10.1037/0278-7393.31.6.1477.

Abstract

Poorer performance in conditions involving task repetition within blocks of mixed tasks relative to task repetition within blocks of single task is called mixing cost (MC). In 2 experiments exploring 2 hypotheses regarding the origins of MC, participants either switched between cued shape and color tasks, or they performed them as single tasks. Experiment 1 supported the hypothesis that mixed-tasks trials require the resolution of task ambiguity by showing that MC existed only with ambiguous stimuli that afforded both tasks and not with unambiguous stimuli affording only 1 task. Experiment 2 failed to support the hypothesis that holding multiple task sets in working memory (WM) generates MC by showing that systematic manipulation of the number of stimulus-response rules in WM did not affect MC. The results emphasize the role of competition management between task sets during task control.

Publication types

  • Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

MeSH terms

  • Cues*
  • Humans
  • Memory*
  • Reaction Time