[Comparative analysis of body composition assessment methods in healthy men and in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease patients: anthropometry, bioelectrical impedance and dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry]

Arch Latinoam Nutr. 2005 Jun;55(2):124-31.
[Article in Spanish]

Abstract

The aim of this study was to examine the agreement between the results of body fat (BF and BF%), fat-free mass (FFM) and FFM index (FFMI= FFM/height2) as estimated by skinfold anthropometry (ANT), bioelectrical impedance (BIA) and dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) in two groups of men (> or = 50 y), one comprising healthy individuals (n=23) and the other, patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) (n=24). Comparisons between body composition techniques were done by repeated measures ANOVA; the Bland & Altman procedure was used to analyse agreement.

Results and conclusions: 1) comparison between healthy and COPD groups showed significant differences between all studied variables; 2) in the healthy group, values for BF, BF%, FFM and FFMI were not significantly different when BIA or ANT was compared to DXA; however, in COPD, values for BF and BF% were significantly higher and for FFM and FFMI significantly lower when BIA was compared to DXA; in contrast, no differences were shown between values for these variables when ANT was compared with DXA; 3) Bland & Altman test, in both groups, showed no agreement between BIA and DXA and between ANT and DXA; it was also shown that body fat was overestimated and fat free mass underestimated by BIA in relation to DXA.

Publication types

  • Comparative Study
  • English Abstract

MeSH terms

  • Absorptiometry, Photon / methods*
  • Adipose Tissue / anatomy & histology*
  • Aged
  • Analysis of Variance
  • Anthropometry / methods*
  • Body Composition*
  • Body Mass Index
  • Case-Control Studies
  • Electric Impedance*
  • Humans
  • Male
  • Middle Aged
  • Pulmonary Disease, Chronic Obstructive*
  • Reproducibility of Results