Influence of vegetation in mitigation of methyl parathion runoff

Environ Pollut. 2006 Jul;142(2):288-94. doi: 10.1016/j.envpol.2005.10.009. Epub 2005 Nov 28.

Abstract

A pesticide runoff event was simulated on two 10 m x 50 m constructed wetlands (one non-vegetated, one vegetated) to evaluate the fate of methyl parathion (MeP) (Penncap-M). Water, sediment, and plant samples were collected at five sites downstream of the inflow for 120 d. Semi-permeable membrane devices (SPMDs) were deployed at each wetland outflow to determine exiting pesticide load. MeP was detected in water at all locations of the non-vegetated wetland (50 m), 30 min post-exposure. MeP was detected 20 m from the vegetated wetland inflow 30 min post-exposure, while after 10d it was detected only at 10 m. MeP was measured only in SPMDs deployed in non-vegetated wetland cells, suggesting detectable levels were not present near the vegetated wetland outflow. Furthermore, mass balance calculations indicated vegetated wetlands were more effective in reducing aqueous loadings of MeP introduced into the wetland systems. This demonstrates the importance of vegetation as sorption sites for pesticides in constructed wetlands.

MeSH terms

  • Biomass
  • Chromatography, Gas
  • Ecosystem*
  • Environmental Monitoring / instrumentation
  • Environmental Monitoring / methods
  • Environmental Restoration and Remediation / methods*
  • Geography
  • Geologic Sediments / chemistry
  • Methyl Parathion / analysis*
  • Pesticide Residues / analysis*
  • Plants* / chemistry
  • Rain
  • Time Factors
  • Water Movements
  • Water Pollutants, Chemical / analysis*
  • Wetlands

Substances

  • Pesticide Residues
  • Water Pollutants, Chemical
  • Methyl Parathion