When siting works, Canada-style

J Health Polit Policy Law. 1992 Spring;17(1):119-42. doi: 10.1215/03616878-17-1-119.

Abstract

Hazardous waste management poses increasing problems for Canadian provinces and American states, given the vast quantities and types of wastes generated and the virtual inability to open new storage, treatment, or disposal facilities. The Canadian experience is very similar to the American one in many respects, except for the fact that three provinces (Alberta, Manitoba, and Quebec) have devised alternative approaches to siting that appear successful in moving beyond the political gridlock so common on this issue. In each of these cases, traditional, top-down approaches to siting have been eschewed in favor of a more comprehensive approach that includes extensive public participation, economic and social compensation packages, formal partnerships between public and private organizations, and direct links between siting proposals and other aspects of waste management, including waste reduction, recycling, and export/import control.

Publication types

  • Comparative Study

MeSH terms

  • Alberta
  • Containment of Biohazards / economics*
  • Environmental Health / economics
  • Environmental Health / legislation & jurisprudence*
  • Environmental Health / standards
  • Hazardous Waste / economics
  • Hazardous Waste / legislation & jurisprudence*
  • Hazardous Waste / prevention & control
  • Humans
  • Manitoba
  • Quebec
  • Refuse Disposal / economics
  • Refuse Disposal / legislation & jurisprudence*
  • Refuse Disposal / methods

Substances

  • Hazardous Waste