Death certification and doctors' dilemmas: a qualitative study of GPs' perspectives

Br J Gen Pract. 2005 Sep;55(518):677-83.

Abstract

Background: Death certificate inaccuracies have implications for funding and planning public health services, health research and family settlements. Improved training has been identified as a way of reducing inaccuracies. Understanding the influences on certifying doctors should inform that training.

Aim: To explore what factors influence GPs as they complete death certificates.

Design: Focus groups held by teleconference with 16 GPs.

Setting: New Zealand general practice.

Method: Four teleconferenced focus groups were taped and transcribed. Transcripts were examined for emerging themes. Credibility, transferability and confirmability were underwritten by a clear audit trail.

Results: Participants identified two factors that influenced death certification: clinical uncertainty and the family. Other themes provided an understanding of the personal and professional concerns for GPs.

Conclusion: Improving death certification accuracy is a complex issue and needs to take into consideration factors that influence certifiers.

Publication types

  • Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

MeSH terms

  • Adult
  • Attitude of Health Personnel*
  • Cause of Death
  • Clinical Competence / standards
  • Death Certificates*
  • Education, Medical, Continuing / standards
  • Family Practice / education
  • Family Practice / standards*
  • Female
  • Focus Groups
  • Humans
  • Male
  • Medical Audit
  • Middle Aged
  • New Zealand / epidemiology