The identification and role of neuropeptides in the control of food intake and energy balance have been extensively studied in rodents, and for more than ten years, similar studies have been performed in sheep. As a photoperiodic ruminant, sheep are an interesting alternative animal model to rodents. In this review, we summarize the results obtained in sheep concerning the distribution of peptide-containing neurones in the hypothalamus and their central role in the control of food intake and energy balance, and compared them with relevant data from rodents. Even if the general organization and the role of hypothalamic neuropeptides are similar in sheep and rodents, numerous differences have been observed between these two species. In sheep, the magnocellular neurones of the paraventricular and supraoptic nuclei are characterized by the low density and the lack of galanin- and neuropeptide-Y-containing neurones, respectively. The sheep pituitary stalk presents neurones containing neuropeptides such as neuropeptide-Y or beta-endorphin, which are also found in the deep part of the infundibular nucleus. In this structure, several neuronal populations, including galanin, agouti-gene related peptide, somatostatin, are sensitive to energy balance variations, undernutrition or overfeeding, which may specifically modify neuropeptide levels in discrete neuronal subgroups. This feature is well illustrated by the number of neuropeptide-Y labelled neurones, that increases in the lateral part of the infundibular nucleus of undernourished ewes and decreases in the ventral part of overfed ewes. Conversely, after 24 hours of food deprivation, the number of neuropeptide-Y-immunolabelled neurones is unchanged in the sheep infundibular nucleus, whereas increased levels of this neuropeptide are described, in rats, by radioimmuno-assay. In conclusion, our review shows that peptide-containing neurone systems, involved in the regulation of food intake and energy balance in sheep, are generally similar to those observed in other species, but they present specific differences according to the physiological characteristics of the animal model.