Clinical experience and acceptability of the etonogestrel subdermal contraceptive implant

Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2005 Sep;90(3):228-33. doi: 10.1016/j.ijgo.2005.06.007.

Abstract

Objective: To evaluate efficacy, adverse effects, and user continuation rate of an etonogestrel subdermal single-rod contraceptive implant.

Methods: A total of 417 healthy volunteers of childbearing age were included in this multicenter trial. After implant insertion, the women were followed up during the 3 years of contraceptive action. At each visit, clinical findings, side effects, and bleeding patterns were recorded. Efficacy and continuation rates were analyzed using the Pearl Index and Kaplan-Meier life tables, respectively.

Results: The observation period totaled 958.5 woman-years (27.5 months per woman). The Pearl Index score was 0. Side effects were reported by 44.4% of users, but the proportion had decreased to 16.5% by the end of the study. The continuation rate was 61.4%. The most common reason for early discontinuation (in 21.1% of the participants) was menstrual disturbances.

Conclusions: Etonogestrel subdermal contraceptive implants demonstrated high efficacy and an acceptable continuation rate. Counseling potential users explicitly about the side effects will optimize patient success with this long-acting contraceptive.

Publication types

  • Clinical Trial
  • Multicenter Study

MeSH terms

  • Adolescent
  • Adult
  • Contraceptive Agents, Female / administration & dosage*
  • Contraceptive Agents, Female / adverse effects
  • Desogestrel / administration & dosage*
  • Desogestrel / adverse effects
  • Drug Implants*
  • Female
  • Humans
  • Longitudinal Studies
  • Menstrual Cycle
  • Mexico
  • Middle Aged
  • Patient Satisfaction*
  • Progesterone Congeners / administration & dosage*
  • Progesterone Congeners / adverse effects
  • Prospective Studies

Substances

  • Contraceptive Agents, Female
  • Drug Implants
  • Progesterone Congeners
  • etonogestrel
  • Desogestrel