The clinical effectiveness of 6 mm diameter implants

J Periodontol. 2005 Jun;76(6):1013-5. doi: 10.1902/jop.2005.76.6.1013.

Abstract

Background: Five- and 6 mm diameter screw-type endosseous implants have been used for the last decade. While some studies have reported very promising results (94% to 98% success rate), others have demonstrated survival rates below those clinically acceptable (75% to 87%). Moreover, such implants have been associated with increased cervical bone resorption and thread exposure.

Methods: Between June 1999 and July 2003, 43 patients received treatment with 6 mm diameter tapered hydroxyapatite (HA)-coated implants. A total of 45 implants were placed. All patients were recalled annually after implant exposure. One patient was lost to follow-up after 1 year. Forty-four implants were evaluated at the recall examinations. All implants supported a fixed prosthesis; in the majority of patients (35 implants), it was a single-tooth fixed prosthesis. The mean loading time was 23.4 months (range, 1 to 54 months).

Results: No implants were lost during the loading period. The overall survival rate was 100%. Crestal bone remodeling was examined using periapical radiographs. After a mean of 23.4 months in function, only one implant presented bone loss beyond the first thread.

Conclusions: This study showed that high survival rates can be obtained after prosthetic treatment with 6 mm-wide tapered HA-coated implants. Long-term prospective studies are needed to confirm these results.

Publication types

  • Evaluation Study

MeSH terms

  • Adult
  • Aged
  • Alveolar Bone Loss*
  • Coated Materials, Biocompatible / therapeutic use
  • Dental Implantation, Endosseous / instrumentation*
  • Dental Implants*
  • Durapatite / therapeutic use
  • Equipment Failure Analysis
  • Follow-Up Studies
  • Humans
  • Middle Aged

Substances

  • Coated Materials, Biocompatible
  • Dental Implants
  • Durapatite