Background: Data on Asian patients who present with reflux symptoms to their primary care physicians are limited.
Aim: To determine whether empirical therapy without endoscopy is appropriate for patients who present to their primary care physicians with uninvestigated reflux symptoms without alarm symptoms.
Method: Forty-seven patients presenting with uninvestigated, dominant reflux symptoms but without alarm features to their primary care physicians underwent endoscopy within 2 weeks of referral. Their endoscopic findings were compared with those of 162 primary care patients presenting with uninvestigated dominant dyspepsia. All patients, except those with ulcers, were treated with esomeprazole 20 mg b.d. for 2 weeks. Their treatment response was assessed at 2 weeks using a symptom score.
Results: Among patients with dominant reflux symptoms, 14 (30%) had erosive oesophagitis. No other clinically significant endoscopic findings were detected among them. In contrast, erosive oesophagitis and peptic ulcer were found in 13 (8%, P < 0.001 vs. reflux group), and 12 (7%, P = 0.06 vs. reflux group), respectively, of patients with dominant dyspepsia. Thirty-seven of forty-five (82%) of those with dominant reflux symptoms and 109 of 139 (78%; P = N.S. vs. reflux group) of those with dominant dyspepsia reported > or = 50% resolution of symptoms after esomeprazole treatment.
Conclusions: Empirical proton pump inhibitor without endoscopy is reasonable for uninvestigated patients who present to primary care physicians with dominant reflux symptoms.