Within-occasion intraindividual variability and preclinical diagnostic status: is intraindividual variability an indicator of mild cognitive impairment?

Neuropsychology. 2005 May;19(3):309-17. doi: 10.1037/0894-4105.19.3.309.

Abstract

Intraindividual variability in cognitive test performance has the potential to be a good marker of preclinical Alzheimer's disease status (S. C. Li & U. Lindenberger, 1999). Using cross-sectional community data from 2,317 individuals aged 60-64 years, the authors of this study found that variability was greater in individuals who met criteria for mild cognitive impairment or aging-associated cognitive decline but not for age-associated memory impairment. Higher variability was associated with lower education and a non-English-speaking background. In contrast to previous findings, variability in this study did not contribute uniquely to meeting criteria for mild cognitive impairment. The reasons for the differences may reside in the authors' method of estimating mean independent variability, the use of an occasion-specific measure, or the relatively younger age of the participants. Follow-up of the cohort in 4 years will yield data on the prospective validity of variability as a risk factor for impairment.

Publication types

  • Comparative Study
  • Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

MeSH terms

  • Adult
  • Age Factors
  • Aging / physiology*
  • Association*
  • Choice Behavior / physiology
  • Cognition Disorders / diagnosis*
  • Cognition Disorders / epidemiology
  • Cognition Disorders / physiopathology*
  • Cross-Sectional Studies
  • Demography
  • Diagnosis, Differential
  • Educational Status
  • Female
  • Follow-Up Studies
  • Humans
  • Individuality
  • Male
  • Middle Aged
  • Neuropsychological Tests / statistics & numerical data
  • Predictive Value of Tests
  • Prospective Studies
  • Psychiatric Status Rating Scales
  • Reaction Time / physiology
  • Reproducibility of Results
  • Risk Factors
  • Severity of Illness Index
  • Surveys and Questionnaires