Vertical gradients of delta15N and delta18O in soil atmospheric N2O--temporal dynamics in a sandy soil

Abstract

The greenhouse gas nitrous oxide (N(2)O) can be both formed and consumed by microbial processes in the soil. As these processes fractionate strongly in favour of (14)N and (16)O, delta(15)N and delta(18)O gradients of N(2)O in the soil profile may elucidate patterns of N(2)O formation, consumption or emission to the atmosphere. We present the first in situ data of such gradients over time for a mesic typic Haplaquod seeded with potatoes (Solanum tuberosum L.). On two adjacent fields in 2002 and 2003, topsoil N(2)O fluxes were measured and the soil atmosphere was regularly sampled for N(2)O concentrations, delta(15)N and delta(18)O signatures of N(2)O at depths of 18, 48 and 90 cm during approximately 400 days. During the entire sampling period, the N(2)O concentrations were the highest and the delta(15)N signatures the lowest in the subsoil (48 or 90 cm depth) as compared with the topsoil, indicating production of N(2)O in the subsoil. For delta(15)N, differences greater than 30 per thousand between topsoil and subsoil on the same date were regularly observed. The highest N(2)O concentration of 100385 microL m(-3) at 90 cm depth on 1 July 2003, was preceded by the lowest delta(15)N value of -43.5 per thousand one week earlier. This was followed by a 150-day general decrease of N(2)O concentrations at 90 cm depth to 1723 microL m(-3) and a simultaneous enrichment of delta(15)N to +7.1 per thousand, mostly without a significant topsoil flux. There was a negative logarithmic relationship between N(2)O concentration at 90 cm depth and its delta(15)N signature. This relationship indicated a delta(15)N signature of -40 to -45 per thousand during the production of N(2)O in the subsoil, and a subsequent enrichment during the consumption of N(2)O. We conclude that the isotopic signature of the N(2)O topsoil flux is the result of various processes of consumption and production at different depths in the soil profile. It is therefore not a reliable estimator for the overall delta(15)N signature of N(2)O in the soil atmosphere, nor for indirect losses of N(2)O to the environment. Therefore, these findings will pose a further challenge to ongoing efforts to draw up a global isotopic budget for N(2)O.