Combining unprotected pancreatic enzymes with pH-sensitive enteric-coated microspheres does not improve nutrient digestion in patients with cystic fibrosis

J Pediatr. 2005 Apr;146(4):489-93. doi: 10.1016/j.jpeds.2004.10.063.

Abstract

Objectives: To assess the efficacy of combining unprotected powder enzymes and oral enteric-coated microsphere (ECM) and to ECM alone in treating nutrient maldigestion in patients with cystic fibrosis.

Study design: Patients were randomly assigned into 2 consecutive, 2-week phases; ECM alone, and ECM plus unprotected powder enzymes. Fecal fat, energy, and nitrogen output were compared with intake at the end of each phase. Two-tailed, paired t tests were performed to compare outcomes.

Results: The mean age of the 14 patients (3 girls) was 5.7 +/- 3.2 years (range, 1.9 to 13.4 years). There was no significant difference in percent malabsorption of fat (15.6% vs 18.2%), energy (13.3% vs 13.4%), or nitrogen (11.8% vs 11.3%) between phases.

Conclusions: The addition of powder enzymes to ECM did not improve nutrient maldigestion compared with ECM alone.

Publication types

  • Clinical Trial
  • Randomized Controlled Trial
  • Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

MeSH terms

  • Adolescent
  • Amylases / administration & dosage*
  • Child
  • Child, Preschool
  • Cross-Over Studies
  • Cystic Fibrosis / drug therapy
  • Cystic Fibrosis / metabolism*
  • Female
  • Gastrointestinal Agents / administration & dosage*
  • Humans
  • Hydrogen-Ion Concentration
  • Infant
  • Lipase / administration & dosage*
  • Male
  • Microspheres
  • Pancrelipase / administration & dosage*
  • Peptide Hydrolases / administration & dosage*
  • Tablets, Enteric-Coated

Substances

  • Gastrointestinal Agents
  • Tablets, Enteric-Coated
  • Pancrelipase
  • Lipase
  • Amylases
  • Peptide Hydrolases