Comparison of cilostazol and clopidogrel after successful coronary stenting

Am J Cardiol. 2005 Apr 1;95(7):859-62. doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2004.12.012.

Abstract

This study compared the safety and efficacy of cilostazol and clopidogrel after coronary stenting. Patients (n = 689) who underwent successful stenting were randomly assigned to receive cilostazol (group 1, n = 344, 612 lesions) or clopidogrel (group 2, n = 345, 628 lesions). The incidence of subacute stent thrombosis or major adverse cardiac events, including death, myocardial infarction, and target lesion revascularization within 30 days (2.6% in group 1 vs 2.0% in group 2, p = 0.61) and side effects that required cessation of study drug (0.6% each) did not differ statistically between groups. These results indicate that cilostazol is as safe and effective as clopidogrel in preventing thrombotic complications after stenting.

Publication types

  • Clinical Trial
  • Comparative Study
  • Randomized Controlled Trial

MeSH terms

  • Aged
  • Angioplasty, Balloon, Coronary / adverse effects*
  • Aspirin / therapeutic use
  • Cilostazol
  • Clopidogrel
  • Coronary Restenosis / etiology
  • Coronary Restenosis / prevention & control*
  • Female
  • Humans
  • Male
  • Middle Aged
  • Myocardial Infarction / etiology
  • Myocardial Infarction / prevention & control
  • Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors / therapeutic use*
  • Prospective Studies
  • Stents / adverse effects*
  • Tetrazoles / therapeutic use*
  • Thrombosis / etiology
  • Thrombosis / prevention & control
  • Ticlopidine / analogs & derivatives*
  • Ticlopidine / therapeutic use*
  • Treatment Outcome

Substances

  • Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors
  • Tetrazoles
  • Clopidogrel
  • Cilostazol
  • Ticlopidine
  • Aspirin