[Comparing three methods of estimating concentration of worksite benzene]

Zhonghua Lao Dong Wei Sheng Zhi Ye Bing Za Zhi. 2005 Feb;23(1):9-11.
[Article in Chinese]

Abstract

Objective: benzene; Air pollution; Risk assessment in the air of workshop and validate the methods.

Methods: Expert-reference, BAYES statistics and expert-measurement were separately used to estimate benzene concentration in a slurry-applying workshop and modeling workshop of a rubber factory. The estimations were compared with current newly monitored data.

Results: The estimated averages of expert-reference, BAYES statistics and expert-measurement were 100.0, 16.9, 33.2 mg/m3 respectively for the slurry-applying workshop and 100, 156, 115 mg/m3 for the modeling workshop. No significant difference was observed between the estimations and validating sample except to that of the expert-reference for the former.

Conclusion: BAYES statistics and expert-measurement were precise and expert-reference was candidate if no measurements in spite of its subjectivity.

Publication types

  • Comparative Study
  • Validation Study

MeSH terms

  • Air Pollution, Indoor / analysis*
  • Benzene / analysis*
  • Risk Assessment*
  • Workplace

Substances

  • Benzene