A prospective evaluation of efficacy and compliance with a multistep treatment approach for erectile dysfunction in patients after non-nerve sparing radical prostatectomy

BJU Int. 2005 Feb;95(3):359-65. doi: 10.1111/j.1464-410X.2005.05300.x.

Abstract

Objective: To assess the response rate to different erectile aids in a consecutive series of patients treated with non-nerve sparing radical prostatectomy (NNSRP).

Patients and methods: Ninety-four potent men were counselled about the different treatment options to restore an assisted erection before they had NNSRP. They were invited to participate in a multiphase protocol involving the sequential use of different erectile aids which aimed at restoring erectile function after surgery. The first proposed treatment was oral apomorphine sublingual. Patients with a positive response to the 1-item overall efficacy question and a minimum score of 3 in both question 3 and 4 of the International Index of Erectile Function were considered responders to oral pharmacotherapy. Treatment with sildenafil was then suggested to those not responding. If patients did not respond to oral pharmacotherapy a trial with a vacuum erectile device was offered; those not responding to this were then offered intracavernosal injection therapy with prostaglandin-E alone as the first option, followed by a mixture of vasoactive agents if needed. In those in whom injections also failed, a penile implant was recommended. At the 1-year follow-up visit all patients were offered a second trial with oral therapy regardless of the treatment currently in use.

Results: Seventy-six patients entered the protocol; there was no response to apomorphine. Five of 59 (8%) patients responded to sildenafil when they first used it at a mean of 7 months after NNSRP, while there were three additional responders in 22 patients who tried it for a second time a year later. Of patients achieving at least a complete tumescence sufficient for vaginal penetration, 52% and 60% were considered responders to the vacuum device and intracavernosal injections, respectively. Overall, 44% of patients enrolled in the protocol chose to use an erectile aid for at-home use. At the 1-year follow-up, only 20% of patients were still using an erectile aid, including two who had had a penile implant.

Conclusions: Up to 10% of patients may achieve a clinically significant erection with sildenafil after NNSRP, but 80% will not be using any erectile aid at 1 year after surgery. In the present study protocol the proposed erectile aids were largely inadequate for treating the permanent erectile dysfunction that follows NNSRP.

Publication types

  • Evaluation Study

MeSH terms

  • Administration, Sublingual
  • Aged
  • Algorithms
  • Apomorphine / administration & dosage
  • Apomorphine / adverse effects
  • Erectile Dysfunction / etiology
  • Erectile Dysfunction / therapy*
  • Follow-Up Studies
  • Humans
  • Male
  • Patient Compliance
  • Penile Prosthesis
  • Piperazines / administration & dosage
  • Piperazines / adverse effects
  • Postoperative Complications / etiology
  • Postoperative Complications / therapy*
  • Prospective Studies
  • Prostaglandins E / administration & dosage
  • Prostatectomy / adverse effects
  • Prostatectomy / methods*
  • Prostatic Neoplasms / surgery*
  • Purines
  • Sildenafil Citrate
  • Sulfones
  • Treatment Outcome
  • Vacuum
  • Vasodilator Agents / administration & dosage

Substances

  • Piperazines
  • Prostaglandins E
  • Purines
  • Sulfones
  • Vasodilator Agents
  • Sildenafil Citrate
  • Apomorphine