Visual landmark orientation by flying bats at a large-scale touch and walk screen for bats, birds and rodents

J Neurosci Methods. 2005 Feb 15;141(2):283-90. doi: 10.1016/j.jneumeth.2004.07.002.

Abstract

Orientation depends on multi-modal information about the locally perceptible environment (local view) in many situations. We developed a behavioural paradigm for investigating visual orientation of flying bats based on a large-scale touch screen (1.2 m x 1.8 m). It functions by a grid of rows and columns of infra-red beams just in front of a screen with back-projected visual stimuli. Approaching animals interrupt the beams and thus permit automatic recording of the time and place of an animal's locational choice. We used it as a vertical touch surface. Installed as a horizontal walk surface, it may also serve as a more natural 'firm ground', circular arena analogue to the 'Morris water maze' for investigating orientation behaviour and spatial cognition from rodents to birds while offering automatic real-time recording of paths, times and latencies with enhanced possibilities to score details of motor behaviour and to control stimuli interactively. Bats offer a unique possibility to investigate the use of both echo-acoustic and visual information processing pathways for the process of self-localization and orientation. In our first experiment, a bat was presented with five identical targets, one central and four peripheral and had to choose the central target. After task acquisition, the array was shifted by the distance between targets, so that a formerly peripheral landmark was now in the absolute location of the formerly central target. At small inter-target distances, the bat 'went with' the array, and chose the new central target (at a new absolute location). With 30 cm or more of inter-target distance (60 cm across the landmark configuration), however, the bat went with absolute location, and chose a peripheral target. In experiment 2, the bat was presented with two landmarks 30 cm apart and an unmarked target located at midline beneath them. On tests, the landmarks either maintained training distance or were expanded to 50 cm apart. On such expansion tests, the bat chose most the location at the correct vector from the right landmark. This showed that the bat first identified a single landmark by the configuration and then applied a previously learnt vector (angle and distance) to locate the target. Glossophaga did not orient by pure angular geometry between landmarks and target.

Publication types

  • Comparative Study
  • Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

MeSH terms

  • Animals
  • Behavior, Animal
  • Birds
  • Chiroptera
  • Choice Behavior
  • Flight, Animal / physiology*
  • Orientation / physiology*
  • Photic Stimulation / methods
  • Rodentia
  • Touch
  • Visual Perception / physiology*