Jitter and size effects on vection are immune to experimental instructions and demands

Perception. 2004;33(8):987-1000. doi: 10.1068/p5242.

Abstract

Both coherent perspective jitter and explicit changing-size cues have been shown to improve the vection induced by radially expanding optic flow. We examined whether these stimulus-based vection advantages could be modified by altering cognitions and/or expectations about both the likelihood of self-motion perception and the purpose of the experiment. In the main experiment, participants were randomly assigned into two groups-one where the cognitive conditions biased participants towards self-motion perception and another where the cognitive conditions biased them towards object-motion perception. Contrary to earlier findings by Lepecq et al (1995 Perception 24 435-449), we found that identical visual displays were less likely to induce vection in 'object-motion-bias' conditions than in 'self-motion bias' conditions. However, significant jitter and size advantages for vection were still found in both cognitive conditions (cognitive bias effects were greatest for non-jittering same-size control displays). The current results suggest that if a sufficiently large vection advantage can be produced when participants are expecting to experience self-motion, it is likely to persist in object-motion-bias conditions.

MeSH terms

  • Adult
  • Analysis of Variance
  • Cognition / physiology*
  • Cues*
  • Female
  • Humans
  • Kinesthesis / physiology*
  • Male
  • Motion Perception / physiology
  • Neuropsychological Tests
  • Size Perception / physiology