Cutting balloon angioplasty is superior to balloon angioplasty or stent implantation for small coronary artery disease

Coron Artery Dis. 2004 Nov;15(7):435-40. doi: 10.1097/00019501-200411000-00011.

Abstract

The aim of this study is to demonstrate initial results and long-term outcomes of patients after receiving cutting balloon angioplasty (CBA), balloon angioplasty (BA), or stenting for small vessel diseases. We studied a total of 327 lesions of small coronary disease treated either by CBA (n=87), BA (n=130), or stenting (n=110) in two affiliated institutes. A small coronary artery was defined as a reference vessel <2.5 mm using quantitative coronary angiography (QCA). Angiographic restenosis was encountered in 31% of the CBA, 46.5% of the BA, and 43.9% of the stent (p=0.048). Major adverse cardiac events (death, myocardial infarction, and target lesion revascularization) at follow-up were significantly lower in the CBA compared to other groups (CBA, 20.3%; BA, 37.3%; stent, 33.3%; p=0.036). The CBA procedure provided superior angiographic and clinical outcomes to the stenting or BA. The CBA may be a cost-effective and reasonable approach for the treatment of lesions in small coronary diseases.

Publication types

  • Comparative Study

MeSH terms

  • Aged
  • Angioplasty, Balloon / methods*
  • Coronary Artery Disease / therapy*
  • Female
  • Follow-Up Studies
  • Humans
  • Male
  • Middle Aged
  • Stents*