Role of different techniques for the placement of Denver peritoneovenous shunt (PVS) in malignant ascites

Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech. 2004 Aug;14(4):222-5. doi: 10.1097/01.sle.0000136675.54624.16.

Abstract

The aim of the study is to evaluate 3 different techniques of Denver peritoneovenous shunt (PVS) placement. Fifty-three patients with malignant ascites underwent placement of 55 Denver PVS by a surgical (33 cases) or percutaneous (18) or laparoscopically assisted (4) procedure. There were 2 cases of postoperative mortality due to cardiac failure, and 7 cases of shunt obstruction (2 of them required replacement). Twenty patients underwent subsequent palliative treatment with chemotherapy or surgery. Complication and control of ascites rates are similar for the 3 techniques. Placement of Denver PVS for the treatment of malignant ascites appears to be a safe and useful procedure. Surgical dissection of the jugular vein is not mandatory. The percutaneous technique is the easiest, fastest, and least invasive procedure. Laparoscopic-assisted positioning is recommended if a peritoneal biopsy and/or abdominal exploration is required for a definitive diagnosis.

Publication types

  • Comparative Study

MeSH terms

  • Adult
  • Aged
  • Aged, 80 and over
  • Ascites / surgery
  • Feasibility Studies
  • Female
  • Humans
  • Laparoscopy
  • Male
  • Middle Aged
  • Peritoneovenous Shunt / methods*
  • Retrospective Studies