Bioassay selection, experimental design and quality control/assurance for use in effluent assessment and control

Ecotoxicology. 2004 Jul;13(5):437-47. doi: 10.1023/b:ectx.0000035294.15964.9a.

Abstract

In the UK Direct Toxicity Assessment Programme, carried out in 1998-2000, a series of internationally recognised short-term toxicity test methods for algae, invertebrates and fishes, and rapid methods (ECLOX and Microtox) were used extensively. Abbreviated versions of conventional tests (algal growth inhibition tests, Daphnia magna immobilisation test and the oyster embryo-larval development test) were valuable for toxicity screening of effluent discharges and the identification of causes and sources of toxicity. Rapid methods based on chemiluminescence and bioluminescence were not generally useful in this programme, but may have a role where the rapid test has been shown to be an acceptable surrogate for a standardised test method. A range of quality assurance and control measures were identified. Requirements for quality control/assurance are most stringent when deriving data for characterising the toxic hazards of effluents and monitoring compliance against a toxicity reduction target. Lower quality control/assurance requirements can be applied to discharge screening and the identification of causes and sources of toxicity.

Publication types

  • Review

MeSH terms

  • Animals
  • Biological Assay / methods*
  • Biological Assay / standards*
  • Daphnia
  • Embryo, Nonmammalian
  • Eukaryota
  • Fishes
  • International Cooperation
  • Invertebrates
  • Ostreidae
  • Quality Control
  • Research Design
  • Rivers
  • United Kingdom
  • Water Pollutants / analysis*
  • Water Pollutants / toxicity*

Substances

  • Water Pollutants