This paper presents a comparison of the embedded ion method (EIM) and the surface charge representation of the electrostatic embedding potential (SCREEP) method, two methods which can be used to calculate solid-state effects on NMR chemical shifts. The results in a selected group of compounds with known single-crystal solid-state NMR data and neutron diffraction structures, confirm that these effects are important in both (13)C and (15)N chemical shifts. The solid-state effects calculated by both methods are similar and of equal statistical quality when compared with the experimental data.
Copyright 2004 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.