Aim: To compare hematopoietic reconstitution after low intensity conditioning transplants and standard allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT).
Methods: We retrospectively analyzed the kinetics of cytopenia of 50 consecutive patients treated with HSCT during a 60 day posttransplant period. Twenty four patients were treated with a low intensity regimen (Fludarabine, 2 Gy total body irradiation) and 26 patients with the standard conditioning regimen. Patients who received the low intensity HSCT were analyzed in two groups, patients with engraftment of donor hematopoiesis and those who rejected the graft.
Results: Patients treated with low intensity conditioning, regardless of its outcome, experienced significantly less severe cytopenia than the patients from the control group. Except for reticulocytes, the development of cytopenia was significantly slower in these patients, and the duration of severe cytopenia was significantly shorter. However, full neutrophil recovery (absolute neutrophil count >1.0 x 10(9)/L) took longer in patients with low intensity HSCT.
Conclusions: The kinetics of cytopenia and hematopoietic recovery after low intensity conditioning HSCT significantly differ from standard HSCT. There is no difference in the initial hematopoietic recovery between patients with or without engraftment after low intensity conditioning. This indicates that the onset, severity, and duration of the cytopenia are influenced primarily by the intensity of the conditioning and by the immunosuppressive regimen after transplantation. Effects are more pronounced for neutrophils than for platelets and reticulocytes.