An Australian casemix classification for palliative care: lessons and policy implications of a national study

Palliat Med. 2004 Apr;18(3):227-33. doi: 10.1191/0269216304pm876oa.

Abstract

Objectives: To provide a nontechnical discussion of the development of a palliative care casemix classification and some policy implications of its implementation.

Sample: 3866 palliative care patients who, in a three month period, had 4596 episodes of care provided by 58 palliative care services in Australia and New Zealand.

Method: A detailed clinical and service utilization profile was collected on each patient with staff time and other resources measured on a daily basis. A statistical summary of the clinical variables was compiled as the first stage of the analysis.

Results: Palliative care phase was found to be a good predictor of resource use, with patients fairly evenly distributed across the five categories. Clients treated in an inpatient setting had poorer function and higher symptom severity scores than those treated in an ambulatory setting, a result that is not surprising in this Australian setting.

Discussion: Implementation of the resultant AN-SNAP classification has been proceeding since 1998 in some Australian jurisdictions. The development and implementation of a classification such as AN-SNAP provides the possibility of having a consistent approach to collecting palliative care data in Australia as well as a growing body of experience on how to progressively improve the classification over time.

Publication types

  • Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

MeSH terms

  • Algorithms
  • Ambulatory Care / classification*
  • Ambulatory Care / statistics & numerical data
  • Costs and Cost Analysis
  • Data Collection
  • Diagnosis-Related Groups / classification*
  • Health Policy*
  • Hospitals, Federal / statistics & numerical data
  • Hospitals, Private / statistics & numerical data
  • Humans
  • New South Wales
  • Palliative Care / classification*
  • Palliative Care / statistics & numerical data