Autocorrelated error and missing data due to dropouts have fostered interest in the flexible general linear mixed model (GLMM) procedures for analysis of data from controlled clinical trials. The user of these adaptable statistical tools must, however, choose among alternative structural models to represent the correlated repeated measurements. The fit of the error structure model specification is important for validity of tests for differences in patterns of treatment effects across time, particularly when maximum likelihood procedures are relied upon. Results can be affected significantly by the error specification that is selected, so a principled basis for selecting the specification is important. As no theoretical grounds are usually available to guide this decision, empirical criteria have been developed that focus on mode fit. The current report proposes alternative empirical criteria that focus on bootstrap estimates of actual type I error an power of tests for treatment effects. Results for model selection before and after the blind is broken are compared. Goodness-of-fit statistics also compare favourably for models fitted to the blinded or unblinded data, although the correspondence to actual type I error and power depends on the particular fit statistic that is considered.