Two transfected cell lines, one carrying a mammalian ornithine decarboxylase (ODC) that is suppressed by polyamines and one carrying a trypanosomal ODC that is not, were used to ask whether ODC suppression is necessary for the antiproliferative activities of two polyamine analogs, N1,N8-bis(ethyl)spermidine (BES) and N1,N14-bis(ethyl)homospermine (BE444). Both analogs accumulated within cells and suppressed S-adenosylmethionine decarboxylase, as well as polyamine-sensitive mouse ODC activity. Neither drug was able to suppress the activity of the polyamine-refractory trypanosome ODC. But, whereas BE444 was able to inhibit growth of both cell lines, BES could inhibit only growth of cells carrying the polyamine-sensitive ODC, under conditions that cause prolonged depletion of endogenous polyamines. We conclude from these studies that the antiproliferative activity of BES, a less potent drug, requires the suppression of ODC. The efficacy of BE444 is enhanced by its ability to suppress ODC. However, it can function without ODC suppression, whereas BES cannot.