A comparison of polyethylene wear rates between cemented and cementless cups. A prospective, randomised trial

J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2004 Apr;86(3):344-9. doi: 10.1302/0301-620x.86b3.14567.

Abstract

We selected randomly a consecutive series of 162 patients requiring hip replacement to receive either a cementless, hemispherical, modular, titanium acetabular cup or a cemented, all-polyethylene cup. These replacements were performed by two surgeons in four general hospitals. The same surgical technique was used and a 26 mm metal-head femoral component was used in every case. After exclusions, 115 hips were studied for differences in rates of wear and osteolysis. The mean clinical follow-up was eight years and the mean radiological follow-up, 6.5 years. The cementless cups wore at a mean rate of 0.15 mm per year and the cemented cups at 0.07 mm per year. This difference was significant (p < 0.0001). Our findings in this mid-term study suggest that cementless cups wear more than cemented cups.

Publication types

  • Clinical Trial
  • Comparative Study
  • Multicenter Study
  • Randomized Controlled Trial

MeSH terms

  • Acetabulum / surgery
  • Adult
  • Aged
  • Aged, 80 and over
  • Arthroplasty, Replacement, Hip / instrumentation*
  • Arthroplasty, Replacement, Hip / methods
  • Bone Cements
  • Female
  • Hip Joint / diagnostic imaging
  • Humans
  • Male
  • Middle Aged
  • Osteolysis / etiology
  • Polyethylene*
  • Prospective Studies
  • Prosthesis Failure
  • Radiography

Substances

  • Bone Cements
  • Polyethylene