Measuring response to chemotherapy in locally advanced breast cancer: methodological considerations

Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2004 Jun:31 Suppl 1:S103-11. doi: 10.1007/s00259-004-1532-y. Epub 2004 Apr 22.

Abstract

In this review the findings of response monitoring studies in breast cancer, using [(18)F]2-fluoro-2-deoxy-D-glucose (FDG) and positron emission tomography (PET), are summarised. These studies indicate that there is a strong relationship between response and decrease in FDG signal even at an early stage of therapy. The review concentrates on methodological aspects of monitoring response with FDG: timing of serial scans, approach to region of interest definition, method of quantification and pitfalls of FDG. It is argued that, for clinical applications, there is now a need to standardise methodology. This would be necessary to establish firm cut-off values for discriminating responders from non-responders, which in turn would provide a means for providing optimal treatment for as many patients as possible.

Publication types

  • Review

MeSH terms

  • Antineoplastic Agents / therapeutic use*
  • Breast Neoplasms / diagnostic imaging*
  • Breast Neoplasms / drug therapy*
  • Clinical Trials as Topic
  • Decision Support Systems, Clinical*
  • Female
  • Fluorodeoxyglucose F18*
  • Humans
  • Image Interpretation, Computer-Assisted / methods
  • Lymph Nodes / diagnostic imaging
  • Lymphatic Metastasis
  • Neoplasm Staging / methods
  • Positron-Emission Tomography / methods*
  • Practice Guidelines as Topic
  • Practice Patterns, Physicians' / standards
  • Prognosis
  • Radiopharmaceuticals
  • Reproducibility of Results
  • Risk Assessment / methods*
  • Risk Assessment / standards
  • Risk Factors
  • Sensitivity and Specificity
  • Treatment Outcome

Substances

  • Antineoplastic Agents
  • Radiopharmaceuticals
  • Fluorodeoxyglucose F18