Objectives: Absolute (DeltaD) and relative (DeltaD/D) arterial diameter distension, parameters related to the elasticity of the vessel, can be measured in superficial arteries using ultrasound-based vessel "wall tracking" techniques. Currently available systems (e.g. the Wall Track System; WTS) measure the displacement of the media-adventitia transition (outer wall). We hypothesize that, given volume incompressibility of the vessel wall, DeltaD and DeltaD/D measured at the outer wall, significantly underestimate vessel distension at the lumen-intima interface (inner wall).
Methods: We measured DeltaD and DeltaD/D at both the inner and outer wall of the common carotid artery in 39 subjects (aged 18-83 years) using a new prototype "wall tracking" system based on the Vivid-7 scanner (GE Vingmed Ultrasound, Horten, Norway). In addition, DeltaD and DeltaD/D were also measured using WTS.
Results: As anticipated, tracking the inner wall yielded lower diastolic diameters than when tracking the outer wall (Ddia = 5.70 +/- 0.80 and 6.91+/- 0.98 mm, respectively, P < 0.0001). DeltaD (0.54+/- 0.16 versus 0.49 +/- 0.16 mm; P < 0.0001) and DeltaD/D (0.096+/- 0.030 versus 0.071+/- 0.026, P < 0.0001) were indeed larger at the inner than at the outer wall. For WTS, Ddia, DeltaD and DeltaD/D were 7.04 +/- 1.02 mm, 0.45 +/- 0.14 mm and 0.066 +/- 0.022, respectively.
Conclusions: On average, DeltaD and DeltaD/D are 10 and 25% higher on the inner than on the outer wall, respectively. Follow-up studies in larger cohort trials are mandatory to assess whether tracking the inner wall yields arterial function parameters with a higher cardiovascular prognostic potential.