Ranking of cities according to public health criteria: pitfalls and opportunities

Am J Public Health. 2004 Apr;94(4):546-9. doi: 10.2105/ajph.94.4.546.

Abstract

Popular magazines often rank cities in terms of various aspects of quality of life. Such ranking studies can motivate people to visit or relocate to a particular city or increase the frequency with which they engage in healthy behaviors. With careful consideration of study design and data limitations, these efforts also can assist policymakers in identifying local public health issues. We discuss considerations in interpreting ranking studies that use environmental measures of a city population's public health related to physical activity, nutrition, and obesity. Ranking studies such as those commonly publicized are constrained by statistical methodology issues and a lack of a scientific basis in regard to design.

Publication types

  • Research Support, U.S. Gov't, P.H.S.
  • Review

MeSH terms

  • Cities / classification*
  • Cities / statistics & numerical data
  • City Planning / standards
  • Communication
  • Data Collection / methods
  • Data Collection / standards
  • Data Interpretation, Statistical
  • Environmental Health / standards
  • Evidence-Based Medicine / standards
  • Health Surveys
  • Humans
  • Information Dissemination
  • Internet
  • Periodicals as Topic
  • Population Dynamics
  • Public Health / standards
  • Quality of Life*
  • Reproducibility of Results
  • Research Design / standards*
  • Selection Bias
  • Urban Health / standards*