Behavioral adaptations of double-pulse methods--primarily collision and refractory period tests--have been employed to unveil the electrophysiological and anatomical characteristics of neural networks of known function. These paradigms are based on trade-off functions: a determination of different combinations of stimuli that yield the same behavioral output. A detailed explanation of the logic and methodology underlying these techniques is elaborated in this paper. The implementation of such approaches to the study of brain stimulation reward (BSR) has provided a means of discriminating between the neurons underlying this behavior from other cells activated by the stimulating electrode, endowing them with a particularly powerful scientific scope. An increasingly detailed portrait of the BSR substrate, both within and outside the medial forebrain bundle, has been emerging as a result of these investigations and is reviewed in this paper. Finally, the challenges associated with these paradigms are discussed and potential solutions as well as future experimental ventures proposed. Attention is drawn to the major contribution of these methods to our understanding of the neural pathways and characteristics underlying BSR.