Arsenic-sulfides confound anion exchange resin speciation of aqueous arsenic

Water Res. 2004 Mar;38(5):1155-8. doi: 10.1016/j.watres.2003.11.014.

Abstract

A field-portable anion exchange resin method (often cited as the Ficklin method (1983)) has been extensively used to distinguish between dissolved arsenite (As(III)) and arsenate (As(V)) species in natural waters. As(III) occurs largely as As(OH)(3), which is uncharged at ca. pH 7, while As(V) is negatively charged and will sorb to the resin. However, we show that negatively charged As(III)-sulfide (thioarsenite) species, important at sulfide concentrations >10 microM, also bind to the anion exchange resins, and therefore might be interpreted incorrectly as As(V). Furthermore, we show that nitrogen-purging, which results in a conversion of As(III)-sulfides to arsenite, can be used to obtain accurate arsenic speciation when resins are used on sulfidic water samples.

Publication types

  • Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

MeSH terms

  • Adsorption
  • Anion Exchange Resins / chemistry*
  • Arsenic / chemistry*
  • Arsenic / isolation & purification*
  • Hydrogen-Ion Concentration
  • Sulfides / chemistry
  • Water / chemistry
  • Water Purification / methods*

Substances

  • Anion Exchange Resins
  • Sulfides
  • Water
  • Arsenic