Cost-utility analysis for endoscopic sinus surgery

Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2004 Jan;130(1):31-8. doi: 10.1016/j.otohns.2003.07.006.

Abstract

Objective: To undertake cost-utility analysis for endoscopic sinus surgery (ESS) in order to analyze the cost-effectiveness of different chronic sinusitis severity groups.

Methods: One hundred ninety-two patients with chronic sinusitis were evaluated with a Chronic Sinusitis Survey (CSS) before and 1-year after ESS. Direct health care cost data during the first year after operation were retrieved. The utility gain is defined as change in the CSS total score. The cost-utility ratio was defined as cost per utility gain. Patients are stratified by disease severity using the Harvard Staging System.

Results: The average total direct cost attributable to ESS is 40,829 NT dollars in the first postoperative year and the average cost-utility ratio is 2194.42 NT dollars. The high cost-utility ratio of 3246.45 NT dollars for pansinusitis cases is due to the higher cost and limited utility gain.

Conclusions: Treating mild and moderate chronic sinusitis are most cost-effective because of their favorable utility gain and relatively reasonable cost. However, there is no proportional linear relationship between disease severity and cost-utility ratio.

Publication types

  • Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

MeSH terms

  • Adolescent
  • Adult
  • Aged
  • Chronic Disease
  • Cost-Benefit Analysis
  • Endoscopy / economics*
  • Female
  • Humans
  • Male
  • Middle Aged
  • Otorhinolaryngologic Surgical Procedures / economics*
  • Prospective Studies
  • Severity of Illness Index
  • Sinusitis / economics
  • Sinusitis / surgery*
  • Taiwan