Clinical evaluation of a new resilient denture liner. Part 1: Compliance and color evaluation

J Prosthodont. 2003 Jun;12(2):82-9. doi: 10.1016/S1059-941X(03)00043-3.

Abstract

Purpose: A new experimental resilient denture liner (MPDS-SL; Lai Laboratories, Burnsville, MN) and Molloplast-B (Buffalo Dental Manufacturing, Syosset, NY) were clinically evaluated for compliance and color change over a 1-year period.

Materials and methods: In this crossover study, each of 20 patients had 2 dentures fabricated with long-term, silicone-based resilient liners, 1 denture with Molloplast-B and the other with MPDS-SL. Each denture was used for 6 months, during which time each patient kept a journal detailing his or her use and cleaning regimen. The 2 materials were assessed for compliance and color at the beginning of the study and again after 3 months and 6 months of use. Compliance was determined by applying a 3-lb force to the surface of the material following a square-wave pattern, using a closed-loop servohydraulic testing system. The force and position values were recorded using a storage oscilloscope. Compliance was measured at 3 locations on each denture and analyzed using data-acquisition software. Images of the dentures were captured using a zoom stereomicroscope with a charge-coupled video camera and image analysis software. The color was measured at 3 locations on each denture; RGB and L* a* b* were calculated.

Results: Compliance increased from baseline to 3 months and from 3 months to 6 months for almost all locations on both materials. Molloplast-B and MPDS-SL differed in average change in compliance at 6 months; the average change in compliance from baseline to 6 months was 453 (standard error, 46) for Molloplast-B and 284 (standard error, 46) for MPDS-SL (p = 0.019). For both materials, color changed significantly from baseline to 3 months and from baseline to 6 months (p < 0.01). MPDS-SL changed significantly less than Molloplast-B from baseline to 6 months for R (p = 0.039), G (p = 0.037), B (p = 0.005), and L* (p = 0.042).

Conclusion: For both materials, compliance increased over 6 months of wear. The color change for MPDS-SL was considerably less significant than that for Molloplast-B.

Publication types

  • Clinical Trial
  • Comparative Study
  • Controlled Clinical Trial
  • Evaluation Study
  • Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
  • Research Support, U.S. Gov't, P.H.S.

MeSH terms

  • Aged
  • Analysis of Variance
  • Biocompatible Materials / chemistry
  • Compliance
  • Composite Resins / chemistry*
  • Cross-Over Studies
  • Dental Stress Analysis*
  • Denture Cleansers / adverse effects
  • Denture Liners*
  • Dimethylpolysiloxanes / chemistry*
  • Female
  • Hardness
  • Humans
  • Male
  • Materials Testing* / methods
  • Middle Aged
  • Organosilicon Compounds / chemistry*
  • Prosthesis Coloring*
  • Silicone Elastomers / chemistry*
  • Siloxanes / chemistry*
  • Stress, Mechanical
  • Time Factors

Substances

  • Biocompatible Materials
  • Composite Resins
  • Denture Cleansers
  • Dimethylpolysiloxanes
  • MDX 4-4210
  • MPDS-SL
  • Organosilicon Compounds
  • Silicone Elastomers
  • Siloxanes